Hi Everyone,
I’ve got a question about the tradeoffs on doing very short, steep hill sprints vs. longer hill sprints on shallower grades.
Basically my situation here in vertically-challenged Philly is that I have two options for easily accessible hills for my sprints. One is the long walkway over the Ben Franklin Bridge, which offers a 4%-ish grade for almost half a mile, plenty of distance to do 15 sec hill sprints with a 2 min rest. I am early in my base period and can do about 10 of these before I start falling short of my mark.
My other option is a nearby highway embankment that is tall enough for a 5 second sprint but not much more than that. This particular embankment is probably between a 1:2 and a 1:3 slope, so between 40 and 50 percent. I take 40 secs rest between each sprint to keep the work / rest ratio the same. I just did this workout and got to 27 before I tailed off. So the total amount of work between the two workouts was very similar.
I’m curious what the tradeoffs and differences in training effect are between these two types of sprints. I can tell you that they felt very different. In the longer, shallower sprints I felt like I reached my max speed at some point around halfway, and the back half of each rep was about carrying that speed through the final few seconds. On the short, steep sprints I felt like I had to generate maximum power with each stride, never really hitting my top speed.
Another observation was that 40 sec after a 5 sec sprint felt very short. Its basically enough time to walk back down and get about 15-20 sec of standing still before the next one starts. So I may experiment with increasing the rest a bit, maybe to a minute.
So, to summarize:
Option 1: 15 sec sprints @4% grade, 2 min walking / standing rest, repeat ~10x or until I start coming up short
Option 2: 5 sec sprints @45% grade, 40 sec walking / standing rest, repeat ~30x
Curious what people think. Thanks!
Nick