Athlete Login
Forum Archives
📣 Our community has moved!
After several years of incredible discussions, we've moved our community to a new home on Reddit where we can better serve our growing family of mountain and endurance athletes.
Join us at our new subreddit forum /r/evokeendurance for:
- Training advice from our coaching team
- Peer support and motivation
- Gear discussions and recommendations
- Trip reports and inspiration
This forum will remain archived so you can still access all the valuable content and conversations from over the years. However, all new discussions and coaching support now happen on Reddit.
Join us on Reddit- This topic has 0 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 10 months, 1 week ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Hi,
I usually track my running by hours in zone and not distance as I live in a hilly area. We’re fast approaching (nordic) skiing season here and most trails will have skiing tracks in a few weeks so I’ll have to transition to skiing. I tend to find that skiing is a lot less taxing than running. So a one hour run at top of zone 2 is a lot more taxing than an hour of skiing in the same zone/intensity. I want to keep my progress/volume somewhat stable. Is there a rule of thumb for converting run volume to ski volume? Like 1 hour of running equals 2 hours of classic skiing?
Anyone have experience with this?
Best regards,
Erik
- The forum ‘Skiing’ is closed to new topics and replies.